Clusteval logo ClustEval clustering evaluation framework
Location: Data Sets » twonorm_50d » Best Parameters
Navigation:
027Hints:

Which parameter sets lead to the optimal clustering quality?

Please choose a clustering quality measure:
Program Best quality Parameter set Clustering
CLARA 0.859 metric=euclidean
k=41
samples=20		 Clustering
Self Organizing Maps 0.98 x=2
y=1		 Clustering
Spectral Clustering 0.97 k=2 Clustering
clusterdp 0.825 k=25
dc=10.77036336360095		 Clustering
HDBSCAN 0.667 minPts=44
k=1		 Clustering
AGNES 0.915 method=flexible
metric=euclidean
k=2		 Clustering
c-Means 0.977 k=2
m=2.25		 Clustering
k-Medoids (PAM) 0.859 k=4 Clustering
DIANA 0.97 metric=euclidean
k=3		 Clustering
DBSCAN 0.667 eps=1.4686859132183112
MinPts=1		 Clustering
Hierarchical Clustering 0.897 method=average
k=12		 Clustering
fanny 0.975 k=2
membexp=1.99		 Clustering
k-Means 0.975 k=3
nstart=10		 Clustering
DensityCut 0.737 alpha=7.8125E-4
K=3		 Clustering
clusterONE 0.925 s=18
d=0.16666666666666666		 Clustering
Markov Clustering 0.667 I=1.2336336336336338 Clustering
Transitivity Clustering 0.827 T=4.572185375484433 Clustering
MCODE 0.717 v=0.9
cutoff=4.895619710727704
haircut=T
fluff=F		 Clustering